Web Analytics
Cookie Consent & the Verification Gap | Feroot Security Skip to content

Cookie Consent &
the Verification Gap

Confidence runs ahead of control.

800

Privacy, legal, marketing and IT professionals surveyedIndependent research conducted by Censuswide for Feroot, May 2026

92

Real-world websites audited by FerootConsent audits, July 15 to September 1, 2026

At a glance

How to read the chartsThe outcome you wantPartialA gapContext

01

CMP adoption and confidence are widespread

Most organizations have a CMP and trust it. Audits still found vendor scripts firing.

What organizations report

Have fully or partially deployed a CMP82%
CMP users who are somewhat or very confident it blocks all pre-consent scripts66%

Censuswide survey for Feroot, May 2026. Base: 800 survey respondents for CMP deployment; 640 respondents whose organizations use a CMP for confidence.

Show the numbers
What organizations report
AnswerValue
Have fully or partially deployed a CMP82%
CMP users who are somewhat or very confident it blocks all pre-consent scripts66%

What the website audits found: vendor script-firing rate

A CMP lowered the rate. It did not stop vendor scripts from firing.

Sites with a CMP60%
Sites without a CMP81%

Feroot consent audits, July 15 to September 1, 2026. Base: 92 audited websites; a CMP was identified on 52.

Show the numbers
What the website audits found: vendor script-firing rate
MeasureValue
Sites with a CMP60%
Sites without a CMP81%

Sites with a CMP also ran more tracking vendors

Median tracking vendors, sites with a CMP16
Median tracking vendors, sites without a CMP9

Feroot consent audits, July 15 to September 1, 2026. Base: 92 audited websites; a CMP was identified on 52.

Show the numbers
Sites with a CMP also ran more tracking vendors
MeasureValue
Median tracking vendors, sites with a CMP16
Median tracking vendors, sites without a CMP9

What it meansCMPs show value. But deployment and confidence don’t prove that every consent choice is honored.

02

Real-world audits revealed five gaps

A cookie banner on the page doesn’t show what vendors actually do.

Share of audited websites with each gap, on the same 0 to 100% scale.

01

Browser opt-outs

93%

of websites continued loading ad and tracking vendor scripts despite the presence of a Global Privacy Control signal.

Base: 83 websites tested

Global Privacy Control is a browser-level preference not to sell or share personal data. It is separate from the cookie banner.

02

“Reject All”

69%

of websites continued loading advertising or tracking vendors after a visitor selected “Reject All.”

Base: 74 websites tested

Vendors kept loading even after visitors explicitly rejected tracking through the cookie banner.

03

Cookie categories

69%

of websites placed a known advertising or analytics cookie in a category the CMP would not block.

Base: 90 websites tested

62%

used “Strictly Necessary” for at least one known advertising or analytics cookie.

Ad cookieLabeled “Necessary”Still allowed

A mislabeled advertising cookie can remain active even when the CMP follows its configured rules.

04

Third-party data flows

82%

of websites allowed third parties to read a form field and send data off-page.

Base: 91 websites tested

Some transfers support expected services, but the results raise questions about which vendors received the information, where it went, and whether those transfers aligned with the organization’s policies and legal requirements.

05

Sensitive fields

24%

of websites gave an outside vendor script password-field read access.

Base: 91 websites tested

35%

gave outside vendor scripts access when username fields were also included.

Advertising scripts were among those with access. Read access alone does not establish password transmission.

Feroot consent audits, July 15 to September 1, 2026. Base: websites where each check could be run, shown on each card.

Show the numbers
Five gaps found in website audits
GapShare of websitesBase
Browser opt-outs: kept loading vendors despite a GPC signal93%83 websites tested
“Reject All”: kept loading vendors after Reject All69%74 websites tested
Cookie categories: ad or analytics cookie in a category the CMP would not block69%90 websites tested
Cookie categories: used “Strictly Necessary” for a known ad or analytics cookie62%90 websites tested
Third-party data flows: third party read a form field and sent data off-page82%91 websites tested
Sensitive fields: vendor script had password-field read access24%91 websites tested
Sensitive fields: access including username fields35%91 websites tested

What it meansThe audits found vendors loading after browser opt-outs and “Reject All,” ad cookies filed as necessary, and form data read by third parties.

03

Confidence is high. Verification is less certain.

Only 8% say every website script is fully authorized. The goal is 100%.

How many of your website scripts are fully authorized?

92% say at least some of their scripts are not fully authorized.

All of them8%
Most (75 to 99%)28%
About half (50 to 74%)26%
Fewer than half38%

Censuswide survey for Feroot, May 2026. Base: 800 survey respondents.

Show the numbers
How many of your website scripts are fully authorized?
AnswerValue
All of them8%
Most (75 to 99%)28%
About half (50 to 74%)26%
Fewer than half38%

Only 14% of organizations with a CMP could confirm pre-consent firing had never occurred

Has a script ever fired before consent on your website?

Tested and confirmed it hadn’t occurred14%
Don’t know or haven’t tested5%
Suspected but not confirmed28%
Confirmed it occurred53%

Censuswide survey for Feroot, May 2026. Base: 640 respondents whose organizations use a CMP.

Show the numbers
Only 14% of organizations with a CMP could confirm pre-consent firing had never occurred
AnswerValue
Tested and confirmed it hadn’t occurred14%
Don’t know or haven’t tested5%
Suspected but not confirmed28%
Confirmed it occurred53%

What it meansConfidence doesn’t always come with technical verification.

04

How teams find unauthorized scripts

Regulatory or legal notices were the most reported discovery path.

How unauthorized scripts were discovered

Regulatory or legal notification29%
Internal security review26%
Manual audit24%
Automated scanning23%
Third-party vendor report12%
User complaint8%

More than one answer was allowed, so totals exceed 100%.

Censuswide survey for Feroot, May 2026. Base: 800 survey respondents.

Show the numbers
How unauthorized scripts were discovered
AnswerValue
Regulatory or legal notification29%
Internal security review26%
Manual audit24%
Automated scanning23%
Third-party vendor report12%
User complaint8%

What it meansMore teams reported learning about an unauthorized script from a regulatory or legal notice than from automated scanning or any other internal check.

05

How ready are teams to prove compliance?

Only 17% are very confident they could demonstrate compliance if audited today.

How confident is your organization that it could demonstrate compliance if audited today?

Very confident17%
Somewhat confident46%
Not very confident27%
Not at all confident10%

Censuswide survey for Feroot, May 2026. Base: 800 survey respondents.

Show the numbers
How confident is your organization that it could demonstrate compliance if audited today?
AnswerValue
Very confident17%
Somewhat confident46%
Not very confident27%
Not at all confident10%

What it meansMore than a third (37%) are not confident they could demonstrate compliance if audited today.

06

The digital environment never stands still

Nearly 9 in 10 have had a vendor change data collection without telling the privacy team.

Change happens between reviews

54% say a vendor changed data collection without notice more than once.

Had a marketing vendor change data collection without notifying the privacy team88.6%
Discover unauthorized scripts at least a few times a year83%

Censuswide survey for Feroot, May 2026. Base: 560 respondents asked about vendor changes; 800 survey respondents for discovery.

Show the numbers
Change happens between reviews
AnswerValue
Had a marketing vendor change data collection without notifying the privacy team88.6%
Discover unauthorized scripts at least a few times a year83%

Scale

65.5%

run 11 to 50 third-party vendor scripts on their websites

Censuswide survey for Feroot, May 2026. Base: 800 survey respondents.

What it meansThird-party technologies multiply and vendor behavior changes between reviews, so what was checked last quarter may not match what runs on the site today.

07

Periodic review is carrying a continuous responsibility

Only 6% monitor continuously in real time. 72% are primarily reactive.

Which best describes your approach to digital experience privacy compliance?

Fully proactiveContinuous, real-time monitoring6%
Mostly proactiveRegular monitoring and review22%
Primarily reactiveAddress issues as they arise, with some monitoring at most72%

Censuswide survey for Feroot, May 2026. Base: 800 survey respondents.

Show the numbers
Which best describes your approach to digital experience privacy compliance?
AnswerValue
Fully proactive6%
Mostly proactive22%
Primarily reactive72%

What it meansWebsites and vendors change continuously. For most teams, verification does not.

08

The verification gap

Confidence runs 52 points ahead of verification.

Organizations with a CMP

Somewhat or very confident their CMP blocks all pre-consent scripts66%
Tested and confirmed pre-consent firing had never occurred14%

Censuswide survey for Feroot, May 2026. Base: 640 respondents whose organizations use a CMP.

Show the numbers
Organizations with a CMP
AnswerValue
Somewhat or very confident their CMP blocks all pre-consent scripts66%
Tested and confirmed pre-consent firing had never occurred14%

Digital environments change continuously, while verification is often periodic.

What it meansClosing that gap requires moving beyond having consent controls in place to continuously verifying how they actually perform.

Put your website to the test

Are your visitors’ consent choices actually being honored?

See what’s happening across your website with Feroot’s free Privacy Consent Assessment.

Get your free assessment For public-facing websites. No installation or code changes required.

About this research

Survey

Censuswide surveyed 800 privacy, legal, marketing and IT professionals at mid-size to large organizations in the US, UK, Canada and Australia, across financial services, healthcare, retail, technology and media, in May 2026. The research was conducted independently on behalf of Feroot Security.

Some questions went to a subset of respondents, such as the 640 whose organizations use a CMP. Each chart shows its base.

Website audits

Between July 15 and September 1, 2026, Feroot ran automated consent audits on 92 company websites, counting each company once. Each gap is reported as a share of the websites where that check could be run.

The audited companies requested a Feroot consent audit, so the results describe that group rather than a random sample of all websites.

Percentages are rounded, so some totals differ from 100%.